Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Belgian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Belgians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,928,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.2%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Belgian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 14.6% | 16.4% |
Range | 13.0% | 15.1% |
Mean | 5.7% | 6.6% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |