Scandinavian vs British Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scandinavian
 British
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scandinavians
British
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
34.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs British Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,401,593 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,154,282 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.57%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | British | 
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.87% | 
| Maximum | 24.6% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 22.7% | 99.1% | 
| Mean | 8.4% | 13.1% | 
| Median | 7.3% | 8.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 13.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 14.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 14.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and British by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193  | Fair 6.2%  |