South American Indian vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Alsatian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Alsatians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 6.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Alsatian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.97% |
| Maximum | 15.9% | 29.2% |
| Range | 14.2% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.7% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alsatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |