Carpatho Rusyn vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
 Alsatian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Alsatians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
35.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
187th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Alsatian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,679,981 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Alsatian | 
| Minimum | 0.63% | 0.97% | 
| Maximum | 19.6% | 29.2% | 
| Range | 19.0% | 28.2% | 
| Mean | 7.2% | 7.7% | 
| Median | 6.5% | 6.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 9.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Alsatians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are British (6.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Ukrainian (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Africa (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alsatians are Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Slovene (6.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207  | Poor 6.3%  |