Tsimshian vs Choctaw Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
 Choctaw
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Choctaw
16.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Choctaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,676,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 4.8%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Choctaw | 
| Minimum | 9.0% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 30.5% | 35.6% | 
| Range | 21.5% | 34.1% | 
| Mean | 18.5% | 22.0% | 
| Median | 18.5% | 21.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 19.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 25.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 6.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Choctaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.84%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |