Arab vs Choctaw Disability
COMPARE
Arab
Choctaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Arabs
Choctaw
11.4%
DISABILITY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab vs Choctaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,795,543 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,676,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 34.7%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 68.2% | 35.6% |
| Range | 65.2% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 12.9% | 22.0% |
| Median | 11.1% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Africa (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Croatia (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Ugandan (11.4%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 89.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 89.8 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Arabs | 89.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 88.3 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 87.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 87.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.4% |
| Kenyans | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Ghanaians | 87.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.5% |
| Russians | 86.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.84%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |