Lumbee vs Osage Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
 Osage
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Osage
15.5%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Osage Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,289,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,799,709 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 9.7%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Osage | 
| Minimum | 3.9% | 5.0% | 
| Maximum | 41.7% | 30.3% | 
| Range | 37.8% | 25.3% | 
| Mean | 19.4% | 18.3% | 
| Median | 17.5% | 17.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 14.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 22.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Osage by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Ottawa (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Chippewa (14.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 14.1%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.6%  |