Cajun vs Choctaw Disability
COMPARE
Cajun
Choctaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Cajuns
Choctaw
14.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun vs Choctaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,702,868 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,676,270 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 5.4%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 35.2% | 35.6% |
| Range | 25.5% | 34.1% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 22.0% |
| Median | 16.7% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cajuns and Choctaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.84%), Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (15.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |