Lithuanian vs Asian Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Asian
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Lithuanians
Asians
2.4%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Asian Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,348,071 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 549,189,639 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Asian |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 4.9% |
| Range | 12.7% | 3.8% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 2.3% |
| Median | 2.6% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.47% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.47% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 0.47% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Asians by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Sierra Leonean (2.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Congo (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (2.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Spain (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Eastern European (2.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Egypt (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (2.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Asians | 99.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.1 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.1 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 99.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.0 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Chileans | 98.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Ugandans | 98.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 98.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.3% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Lithuanians | 98.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 98.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.4% |