Lithuanian vs Asian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Asian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Lithuanians
Asians
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Asian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 415,877,620 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,573,654 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.368 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 0.48%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Asian |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.65% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 30.3% |
Range | 99.8% | 29.6% |
Mean | 19.4% | 11.2% |
Median | 13.9% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.4% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.1% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Asians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Bolivia (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Luxembourger (13.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Immigrants from Australia (13.6%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |