Kiowa vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Alaskan Athabascan
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Kiowa
Alaskan Athabascans
79.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,396 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 79.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217 and weighted average of 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Alaskan Athabascan | 
| Minimum | 45.5% | 26.1% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 54.5% | 73.9% | 
| Mean | 76.0% | 79.1% | 
| Median | 76.4% | 81.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.7% | 71.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.0% | 95.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 23.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 18.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.3% | 18.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Native/Alaskan (78.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cherokee (81.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Comanche (81.5%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Mexico (81.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Chickasaw (80.9%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 81.3%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 80.6%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 78.9%  |