Immigrants from Western Asia vs Laotian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Laotian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Laotians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Laotian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,832,654 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.1%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.57% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 8.6% |
Range | 25.0% | 8.0% |
Mean | 3.7% | 3.7% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Laotians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bahamas (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |