Immigrants from Western Asia vs Cuban Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Cuban
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Cubans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Cuban Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,105,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.60%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Cuban |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 10.1% |
| Range | 25.0% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 2.7% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Cubans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |