Immigrants from Western Asia vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Western Asia
Zimbabwean
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Western Asia
Zimbabweans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Western Asia vs Zimbabwean Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,322,265 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.74%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Western Asia | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.53% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 6.9% |
| Range | 25.0% | 6.4% |
| Mean | 3.7% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.72% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Asia and Zimbabweans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are South American Indian (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |