Immigrants from South Africa vs Armenian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Armenian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Armenians
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Armenian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,300,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,935,908 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.29%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Armenian |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 39.5% |
| Range | 29.0% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 12.6% |
| Median | 12.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Armenians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 94.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 93.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Ghanaians | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |