Immigrants from South Africa vs Bhutanese Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Bhutanese
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Bhutanese
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Bhutanese Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,300,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,462,899 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 4.8% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 29.0% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 13.2% | 12.6% |
| Median | 12.0% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Bhutanese by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |