Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Choctaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Choctaw
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,275,583 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 54.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 30.3% |
| Range | 15.4% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 13.7% |
| Median | 4.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |