Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Iranian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Iranians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,275,583 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Iranian |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 19.5% |
| Range | 15.4% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and Iranians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |