Immigrants from China vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Choctaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from China
Choctaw
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 56.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 30.3% |
| Range | 12.3% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 13.7% |
| Median | 4.8% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |