Guamanian/Chamorro vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Choctaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Choctaw
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Choctaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,865,083 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.111 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,636,195 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 32.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 17.3% | 30.3% |
| Range | 14.4% | 25.8% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 13.7% |
| Median | 6.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.83%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 9.5% |