Immigrants from Russia vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Russia
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Russia
Bhutanese
11.1%
DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Russia vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,926,154 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.012 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Russia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.87% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 21.0% |
| Range | 35.5% | 17.0% |
| Mean | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.5% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Russia are Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |