Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Bhutanese
11.3%
DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,586,724 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.68%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 4.6% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 21.0% |
| Range | 25.2% | 17.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 11.0% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.3% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Denmark (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uganda (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guyanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (11.3%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |