Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Bhutanese
11.3%
DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,819,373 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.770 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.41%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 21.0% |
| Range | 95.6% | 17.0% |
| Mean | 14.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.8% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.2% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Nicaraguan (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uruguay (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants (11.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |