Luxembourger vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Luxembourgers
Bhutanese
11.3%
DISABILITY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,681,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 3.1% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 26.9% | 21.0% |
Range | 23.7% | 17.0% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.5% |
Median | 11.0% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Syria (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Guyanese (11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (11.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |