Immigrants from Poland vs Bhutanese Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Poland
Bhutanese
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Poland
Bhutanese
11.1%
DISABILITY
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
81st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Poland vs Bhutanese Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,838,062 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.530 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Poland | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 30.6% | 21.0% |
| Range | 25.7% | 17.0% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 11.5% |
| Median | 10.9% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Poland and Bhutanese by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Chilean (11.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Switzerland (11.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Russia (11.1%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Chileans | 99.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.0 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 98.9 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.9 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |