Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Immigrants
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Immigrants
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,430,784 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 20.4% |
| Range | 18.5% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |