Immigrants from Nigeria vs Danish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Danish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Danes
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Danish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,430,784 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Danish |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 51.6% |
| Range | 18.5% | 50.4% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 7.5% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |