Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Uruguay
Immigrants
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,255,356 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.088 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uruguay | Immigrants |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 20.4% |
| Range | 9.2% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.1% |
| Median | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uruguay are Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |