Immigrants from Nigeria vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Costa Rican
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Costa Ricans
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Costa Rican Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,430,784 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,560,556 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.30%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 18.7% |
| Range | 18.5% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.3% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 3.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Costa Ricans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Estonian (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |