Immigrants from Nigeria vs Macedonian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Macedonian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Macedonians
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Macedonian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,430,784 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.607 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,658,712 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 19.4% | 10.7% |
| Range | 18.5% | 9.1% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 5.9% |
| Median | 5.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Macedonians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |