Immigrants from Nepal vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Central Americans
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,771,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 12.1%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Central American |
Minimum | 0.79% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 10.3% |
Range | 11.1% | 9.0% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Median | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |