Yup'ik vs Central American Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Central American
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yup'ik
Central Americans
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Central American Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,959,471 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,305,341 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.287 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 17.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yup'ik | Central American |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.6% | 10.3% |
| Range | 13.9% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 5.5% |
| Median | 5.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.6% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Belarus (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |