Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Korea Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Korea
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Immigrants from Korea
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Immigrants from Korea Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,771,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,118,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Immigrants from Korea |
Minimum | 0.79% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 11.9% | 24.1% |
Range | 11.1% | 23.0% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.3% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Immigrants from Korea by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |