Immigrants from Nepal vs Cypriot Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
 Cypriot
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Cypriots
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cypriot Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,771,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,126 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Cypriot | 
| Minimum | 0.79% | 0.38% | 
| Maximum | 11.9% | 12.7% | 
| Range | 11.1% | 12.3% | 
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.3% | 
| Median | 5.3% | 5.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Cypriots by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 5.5%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 5.5%  |