Immigrants from Nepal vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
 Iranian
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Iranians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Iranian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,771,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Iranian | 
| Minimum | 0.79% | 1.7% | 
| Maximum | 11.9% | 19.5% | 
| Range | 11.1% | 17.7% | 
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 5.3% | 4.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 3.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 3.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal and Iranians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 5.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 5.2%  | 
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 5.4%  | 
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 5.4%  |