Immigrants from Nepal vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nepal
Bangladeshi
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nepal
Bangladeshis
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
26th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nepal vs Bangladeshi Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,771,176 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,368,014 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 16.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Nepal | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 15.6% |
| Range | 11.1% | 12.2% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 7.0% |
| Median | 5.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nepal by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nepal are Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cambodian (5.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Iraq (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |