Immigrants from Italy vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Romanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Romanians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,167,823 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.21%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Romanian |
| Minimum | 0.65% | 1.00% |
| Maximum | 14.0% | 39.7% |
| Range | 13.4% | 38.7% |
| Mean | 6.5% | 8.7% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Romanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Zaire (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |