Macedonian vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
Romanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Romanians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Romanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,658,712 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.010%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Romanian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.00% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 39.7% |
| Range | 9.1% | 38.7% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 8.7% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Romanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Moldova (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |