Immigrants from Mexico vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Poles
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 47.7% |
| Range | 25.1% | 45.5% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 9.1% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |