Immigrants from Mexico vs Italian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Italian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Italians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
22.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Italian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 574,457,060 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Italians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Italian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 26.4% | 31.5% |
| Range | 25.1% | 29.8% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Italians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Italians are Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |