Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Poles
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Polish |
Minimum | 1.7% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 14.6% | 47.7% |
Range | 13.0% | 45.5% |
Mean | 5.7% | 9.1% |
Median | 5.6% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |