Yugoslavian vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Polish
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Poles
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,658,107 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Polish |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 23.6% | 47.7% |
Range | 21.6% | 45.5% |
Mean | 7.7% | 9.1% |
Median | 6.5% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |