Lumbee vs Polish Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
 Polish
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Poles
9.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
26.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
197th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Polish Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,273,744 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 560,051,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 53.8%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Polish | 
| Minimum | 3.9% | 2.2% | 
| Maximum | 24.6% | 47.7% | 
| Range | 20.7% | 45.5% | 
| Mean | 11.5% | 9.1% | 
| Median | 10.8% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 6.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 8.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 7.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 7.3% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Houma (9.3%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 7.5%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 8.2%), Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and Kiowa (8.6%, a difference of 10.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 9.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Poles by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201  | Fair 6.2%  | 
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203  | Poor 6.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204  | Poor 6.2%  |