Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,694,852 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 17.4%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Immigrants from Sri Lanka |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.94% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 13.0% |
Range | 25.1% | 12.1% |
Mean | 6.9% | 5.2% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Ethiopian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Kuwait (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |