Immigrants from Mexico vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Mexico
Samoan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Mexico
Samoans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
11.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Mexico vs Samoan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,370,670 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.320 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,059,815 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Samoans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.13%.

Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Mexico | Samoan |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 18.6% |
Range | 25.1% | 17.1% |
Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Mexico and Samoans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |