Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Korea
Burmese
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Korea vs Burmese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,118,040 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Korea and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 465,101,003 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 0.81%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Korea | Burmese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 24.1% | 23.5% |
| Range | 23.0% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.3% |
| Median | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Korea and Burmese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Korea are Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |