Immigrants from Latvia vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
South American Indians
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,739,259 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.33%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | South American Indian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 37.7% | 27.7% |
| Range | 35.1% | 23.4% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 13.3% |
| Median | 10.8% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |