Immigrants from Italy vs South American Indian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
South American Indian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
South American Indians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs South American Indian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,211,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,942 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.74%.

Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | South American Indian |
Minimum | 2.1% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 27.7% |
Range | 33.6% | 23.4% |
Mean | 12.8% | 13.3% |
Median | 10.5% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and South American Indians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |