Immigrants from Europe vs Macedonian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Europe
 Macedonian
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Europe
Macedonians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
82.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Europe vs Macedonian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,240,570 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Europe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,656,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.22%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Europe | Macedonian | 
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 21.7% | 
| Range | 96.4% | 20.1% | 
| Mean | 20.7% | 10.8% | 
| Median | 10.7% | 11.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.6% | 9.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 12.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 3.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.7% | 3.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 3.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Europe and Macedonians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Europe are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), South African (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130  | Excellent 10.9%  | 
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143  | Excellent 11.0%  | 
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144  | Good 11.0%  |