Immigrants from Ghana vs Macedonian Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Macedonian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Macedonians
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Macedonian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,919,905 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,656,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.61%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Macedonian |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 27.2% | 21.7% |
| Range | 26.2% | 20.1% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.8% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana and Macedonians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |